Low CoG limitations reply
Low CoG limitations reply. This is a reply to David Botting's paper with my comments inserted.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Low CG design limitations edited.doc | 60 KB |
»
- Arthur's blog
- Login to post comments
I was looking forward to some
I was looking forward to some interesting debate on this. looks like you skirted around, ignored or confused most of the points being made. Congratulations. Oh well.
The article was not meant to say 'All high CG bikes are better in every respect than all low CG bikes'. I thought the title was the givaway on that. I hoped that the article at least added balance to the issue of CG height, if it wasn't totally balanced itself.
I'm pleased that your bike gives you the results you want. Thats the really important thing at the end of the day isn't it?
David.
I was looking forward to some
Which points have been skirted, ignored?
Of Arthur's reply, what is confused and is therefore not correct?